plaint page, 2004 degree denial                         student grievance, undergraduate, 2004, hass substitution petition denial                         page color, black on white,   black on gray,   white on blue;     about page / home


                application for bachelor of science degee, 2004                 February 1                 SB degree application, form to fill, mailed letter, June 11                 July 12
                class credit transfer forms 2004                 transfer-credit-form-hist1020_.jpg                 transfer-credit-form-math3070_.jpg                     2004 degree completion page
                hass substitution petition form                 hass_substitution_petition_form__.jpg
                institute requirements committee                 committee_denial_.txt                     student dispute letter re institute requirements denial                     ombudsperson contact call memory
                humanities departments school office letter to student that it opposes hass substitution petitions and that it is the "committee's policy to follow the recommendation" of the school "on this kind of issue"

                readmission form, for spring 2010                 p2         p3         p4         p5         attachment 1, page 1         attachment 1, page 2         attachment 2                 physics major status sheet


                ________

                my sorry story and the tortious malfeasance of an institute committee, re hass substitution petition, 2004

                Sorry to be estranged, from this terrible run I've had, potential for a decent life wasted, with degree long unresolved, trapped in a physics major, up for two-class resolution in 2002, all to nought for want of a dollar guarantor for an Apt. lease, other housing solutions, and trouble with an institute requirements committee decision re hass substitution petition, 2004.   Maybe a tortious malfeasance case for settlement, that the committee denial statement was logically invalid.   Terrible senselessness all around.

                A sorry story with the sparseness in my career timeline so far, between difficulty with my university and strange family funding, trailed away with the degree long unresolved and nearly complete.   Sorry not to have applied for more job openings than I have over the years, in the limits of my solitary energy, living in ruin under the tortious damage.

                Beautiful semester, 2010, loved it, even under tortious malady, student life, how tortious this tortious malady.

                I'm Allen Jordan, and I was defrauded of my university degree for six years, 2004-2010, by tortious malfeasance of an institute committee.*

                ________

                Here toward the end of twenty-eighteen, I've been looking at my 2004 institute requirements committee case.   It appears to me a case of tortious malfeasance, plainly stated in institute culture, a logically invalid denial of institute requirements satisfaction for degree completion, logically impertinent denial of a formally defined institute petition, the "hass substitution petition" that a class has met the "general and mechanical criteria for hass-d subjects," sixteen criteria labeled 1 a to e and 2 a to k.   No statement against the transferred class having met any of those criteria, by the transfer credit examiner, by the humanities school, by the denying committee.

                Per request of the humanities school that "hass substitution petition" not be granted, "hass substitution petition" denied with logically invalid statement to student that "after careful review the Committee agreed with the Transfer Credit Examiner's determination that this subject did not meet the criteria to transfer as a HASS-D class."   "Omnibus survey text," middling papers, not A-level work... never a statement to the student from the transfer credit examiner or the humanities school that any of the "general and mechanical criteria for hass-d subjects," sixteen criteria labeled 1 a to e and 2 a to k had not been met by the transferred class, university to institute, 2004.   Tortious malfeasance?   Damage, estimated time to resolve?

                The attorney I contacted at the time of the institute requirements committee denial, to possibly carry or refer the case, died of sudden ailment, and I did not seek another legal contact to consider the matter at that time.   In sparse social condition I did not discuss the case for years, barely even with my old parents, who eventually supported a move back to institute-vicinity for single-class degree completion in 2010, strangely non-sensical people who would not support a ninth semester, to speak of a change of major midway, to open an apartment lease for two-class degree completion in 2002, calling to throw mad fits during the supported 2010 semester and months around, varied inane, illogical impositions to insult the student for receiving their voice contact, four mad fits through a fine ten-month in my old college town (university city area).

                Embarrassed not to have had the energy to apply for more job opportunities than I have, applied for a few from Somerville 2010, before moving back to the old house in San Diego, October 2010.   I may have a solid angle at placing back into Statistical Programming work, with some 2008 experience still relevant today, other possibilities, Computer Programming, Software Engineering, pdf resumé available.   Ruined not to have minded my education and career more sensibly, personal matters, amid institute difficulty, family malady, institute requirements committee tortious malfeasance 2004, logically invalid denial of transfer credit substitution, per demand of humanities departments, ruined student graduated 2010, essentially maybe a one-year tort, unresolved, six, fourteen years under tortious malady.   Relative waste of life and potential, drawn out in strange ruin with my thoughts, time, and energy, under extended tortious malady unresolved.

                How damaging it was for the student, to receive a logically invalid, impertinent denial of institute requirements petition, university graduation denied, by institute academic fraud.   The student doesn't want a tort, 2004, 2010, doesn't feel like looking at the case again until 2018 -- I resent it.   University-class institute, institute fraud anti-academic, a tort, with class, poverty, and senseless family funding behaviour, graduating student massively damaged, a tort instead of a technical career, maybe still essentially a one-year tort just, if such a thing it is.

                A terrible waste of life and potential, living in terrible, poor form for years.   The harm has been too great.

                Weakness not to have proceeded with the question of the case for years, time and energy, reduced life in ruin, varied interests and burdens.   To have applied more and possibly made well, solutions along the way to have avoided this end, claim for damage to be repaired.   Dishonorable institute to have so acted through that committee point, vicious labor collegium lost in the tech.

                A sorry run, in the limits of my energy and perspective, between vain family funding behaviour, difficult university, tortiously malfeasant institute actors, tortious malfeasance 2004-2005, tortious malady 2004-2010, 2018.

                I don't know if there's a case here, for settlement, a one-year tort, a six-year tort, anyway, my dumb story, I resent it, be it as it may.

                ________

                There may be no case here.   My language usage over matters of law may be evocatively or directly malappropriate in legal art.   With this case page on my personal website, in a folder unlinked to from root index or pages thence, case page posted December 2018, I'll ask one or more legal contacts to consider the matter for possible carriage or referral, for one to attorney this matter, how damaged the student, how damaged the honor of the institute, that they may compose repair.

                "Logically invalid?"   Is it appropriate and seemingly correct for the apex case point of the committee denial of institute requirements credit substitution petition, committee statement fallen back to "agree[ing]" with the transfer credit examiner who did not consider the petition or state against credit substitution?   Impertinent denial, petition unconsidered.   "Tortious malfeasance"?   Life under "tortious malady," unrepaired?

                Petition denied by institute "fraud," logically invalid denial, under departmental interests that such petition not be granted, no matter, 2004-2005, massive damage to student aside?   Institute fraud, or just a tort anyway?   Institute committee-issued academically non-sensical massive collateral damage to student, non-sensical denial of degree completion?   I was NMS for GWU if there I'd travelled to stay and study.

                ________

                university classes transcripts           advanced placement grade report       university of california, san diego       massachusetts institute of technology       university of utah









                ________

                I haven't gotten my hopes up too high, about there potentially being a viable case for settlement.   I would tend to think that the story ought to have a settlement line.

                I'm happy to have this page up as a statement of plaint, damaged from a face of the MIT institute, by ethical lapse and tortious malfeasance under policy, 2004, distant student destroyed.

                It seems to me an ethical breach, for the committee to deny under transverse policy a correctly stated class substitution petition, and for the committee denial statement to be vainly impertinent to the petition form, a horrifying ethical breach for the student to observe.   For the committee members, an ethical lapse to deny under policy interest otherwise a correctly stated class substitution petition, and an ethical breach to issue a falsely academic denial statement impertinent to the logic of the petition form.

                Thoughts on the ethics of this thing, hass substitution petition, denial, dispute, delayed graduation, and plaint?

                No idea how solid this material is to claim for damage, education tort and some county.   Maybe just an odd student life story.   Tortious moments; tortious irony.

                I applied for two job listings in December of 2018.   For one I didn't hear back, but I still feel decently applicable for that kind of job.   I heard back for the other one, halting the consideration on the point of not yet having studied object-oriented programming.   A project refactoring my spherical spacewar program into an object-oriented design could be an exercise to study that material.

                I'm worrying about maybe having misused the words "tort" and "tortious," if they're logically incorrect for the matter, re hass substitution petition, 2004, committee decision plaint.

                ________

                hass substitution petition, 2004, denial plaint

                I'm worrying about maybe having misused the words "tort" and "tortious," if they're logically incorrect for the matter, hass substitution petition, 2004, denial plaint.   Dreading to read Wikipedia articles or search the web to learn legal basics of that word, potentially mortified not to have happily used it correctly, I might try to rewrite my plaint without, then study from there.

                Not expecting this matter to be suitable for action, it would be nice to recognize the breach and make repair.   Sorry story of strange ruin.

                The student's sense of the magnitude of the thing at the time, was that by dint of illogical denial under policy so, facially mendacious and fantastically academic in statement, to proceed in independence, the student's account of tuition paid in would be up for transfer out, that education proceed.

                My story is super lame, but I'm not looking to make a lame complaint.   Is there a solid basis to argue for liability from the hass substitution petition denial statement by the committee on curricula, 2004?   For failure of duty in governance over the question of the petition and the student's degree with mendacious committee denial statement issued, degree denied for six years under tortious damage, the student claims that the MIT corporation be liable for one and five years times a yearly figure, six times sixty for the three-six-o.   One and five times a fair, friendly figure of sixty k, three-hundred and sixty thousand dollars, usd.   Legal query for lawful consideration.

                Renaming page folder to       /about/university/

                eth address,   0x76CcFB45860574Cfa3019891BC38931F833BA333

                ________

                No complaints against my college alumni group, I'm happy to accept 20k of scholarship funding, filled against this claim, from them, up to 20k, zero to twenty, two is nice.   Blow it out your modern portfolio, two-hundred and forty fills the three-sixty claim...

                From that committee and its head, denial statement issuing, personally discrediting your humanities school and academic committee level to the student, in academic fraud against the student, for the vicious vanity of humanities departments' school petit to monstrous -- horrendous, vile, unfit for educational governance.   The value of the product, be great, we are not to commit academic fraud against the student.   Through the performance of two office twits, the head of the committee on curricula issuing a denial statement not stating that the denial was under a policy, stated rather as mere agreement, and no literate, logical reply to student's letter of dispute, beyond the ombudsperson's message to schedule a call, to be a snotty twit on the phone.   A purely administrative committee and denial, denial policy unstated, academic fraud against the student.   To resolve the dispute, to file a grievance...

                What has transpired here, to bring this matter, is absurd and a travesty; here, the context of this plaint.


                        Check my plaint, yo, check my plaint, hass substitution denial plaint.
                        Too plaintive to read - send it to my department attorney, kicking it real in the three-six-o.
                        Too plaintive to read on this topic - for how long - unrepaired - keeping it real in the three-six-o.
                        Check the blockchain, retarded work energy - one-hundred watts when it's cold, is it wrong?
                        Two-hundred and forty fills the three-sixty claim - keeping it real in the three-six-o.
                        Happy with zero to two to twenty from happy alumni college group, kicking it real in the three-six-o.

                        Check my plaint, yo, check my plaint,     /about/university/     on my personal website.

                        https://etherscan.io/address/0x76ccfb45860574cfa3019891bc38931f833ba333

                        https://cometary-dash.neocities.org/about/university/
                        https://alum.mit.edu/www/alljordan/about/university/
                        Mixed feelings about these usernames I've picked...

                        Acknowledgement to Dance 360 (2004-2005), dance competition television show, for "keeping it real in the three-six-o," if from there I heard that line.


                Difficult feelings looking at this material, for the aged student.   I appreciate the support of my parents, for eight semesters at MIT, a semester at the University of Utah, and for one class further, under tortious damage.

                A terrible waste of the family value to withhold support for the happy solution in the fine college town itself, for eight years, 2002-2010, attached to jealous contempt against further expenditure in that college town, family tort non-liable, house plaint.

                "Strange ruin" in fine, familiar quarters.   Regrets, meaning to move.

                Fine university, fine departments.   Regrets not to have changed major or moved back sooner.   Terrible business to be there or not, absent support.

                The student feels terrible about not applying for a dorm assignment in 2002, at age 27 to catch two classes, tragic error to not have made that move.   To have called for aid elsewhere, to have bought another old motorhome... to have settled the degree and proceeded undisplaced from proceeding with one's life undisplaced, one's university degree denied for six years under tortious damage, displaced.   Ruing travel in my lifetime to either city area of San Diego, California or Cambridge, Massachusetts, where and how I came to have been cheated of my undergraduate university degree, a damaged student, short of restitution, unrepaired.

                ________

                tortious legal query, mit hass substitution petition denial, 2004, degree denied 2004-2010

                If this matter be actionable, comparatively and justly so, let action be taken.   I, Allen Jordan, damaged student, denied graduation for six years under tortious damage by the academical fraud of an educational institute committee under policy for other interest: the student calls for legal aid.   Be my champion.   Win us this happy settlement.

                If it's not actionable, suitable, competitively risible, that's cool too.   The student survives, barely, unrepaired.   Our happy ways.   Too old, too frail, limited away...

                I'm meaning to add another page or two of paragraphs to this statement page, spring 2019.   To share with my old college-day peers my sorry proceeding tale, and if legally sound with a lawyer to litigate.

                Meaning to clean up the writing, a bit, retaining plaintive mood, sprawl and basket, plaint on web.   Perhaps but a piece of legal whimsy, plaintive filing, plaint on web.   I want my lawyer.









                ________

                plaint on web, university committee denial, degree denied 2004-2010, claim for $360k

                I did not hear back from E________ H_______, Esquire, re my plaintive legal query, e-mailed in December holidays and sorry not to have heard back by mid-Jan, 2018-2019.   Nobody's problem to care for this case, at base, if such a world it is where __H would not care for justice for A____, to kick her happy sticks to Cambridge and make it rain, repair composed for __J.   That's cool though, difficult law?   Poor case?

                From my plaintive perspective, the student is claiming for six years times a yearly figure, six by sixty for the three-six-o.

                Not to importune, I'll try a local contact maybe, or the b________ list.   Silly legal query, too old?

                I wonder if that Dean would have flipped the schools & professors administration committee decision, had the student proceeded to ask, having sent his letter of dispute, to formally forward that to the appropriate dean.   That the honor of the educational institute and value of its society be lost to the student, unrepaired.   Tragically, the hostile conversation with the ombudsperson plus the subsequent random death of the lawyer freshly joining potentially per need, seem to have thrown the student to have not further stated the matter for some time.         (ombudsperson contact call memory)

                Old college friends, maybe try catching with me if you're out this way sometime anyway, amicably, even with MIT grievance unsettled.

                Tragic pile of errors between the student, his old parents, and the educational institute, to suspend the value of their degree, for six years under tortious damage, 2004-2010.

                ________

                six years of tortious damage, 2004-2010, plaint on web and virtual jury call

                I'm still feeling terrible about this committee decision.   Any to back it up?

                Tragic combination for the student.

                For a virtual jury, plaint on web hearing, the student has sent e-mail messages on and about this page, to twelve members or residents of his college/university years' student house, the b___ c______ of the c__ p__ f_________, at m__, to ask their legal consultation review.

                I look forward to awaiting discussion.   As a matter of scholarship, I ask for zero, one, or two thousand dollars from each of those twelve, as they feel, re the matter, in a measure of scholarship dollars, eight to ten a fine total over the list of twelve.   On the matter of the tortious plaint, I ask their valuation of the matter, the value of our degrees and years.

                Remainders, further coverage of the thing and scenery, I have some things in mind, and I'm amiable to respond regarding areas of interest.

                Sending the plaint on to the b________ list, I would consider a total of up to forty thousand dollars to be a happy graduate scholarship value for the poor, aged student at this time, to afford to move and study.

                ________

                Forty-two hundred dollars was the request from the student to his undivorced parents in 2002 to open a lease, four times the monthly rate comprising two months, a deposit available for repair of occupancy damage at lease's end, and estate broker fee.   Four k, four-thousand dollars...

                At the time, the thought did not occur to the student to request just that much support, or three k without a broker fee, from his college house alumni list, to make the move with an apartment leased, as well just so even so.   A plausible absurdity, absurd family dereliction made up for, four-twenty each over a list of ten.   Four k, three k, one k, or zero short of making a move to knock out the old, unfinished undergraduate degree, by various decent options.

                As it went, excited to withhold support for a move back to the Cambridge area, the student's aging parents proceeded to support the living expense of approximately half of the student's two years in Utah and five in Washington, half of seven years, for forty k maybe, three point two k for two classes at the University of Utah, and ten months in Somerville by Cambridge for some thousands more.

                Sorry not to have studied and applied more than I have, to have called for moving aid in 2002, come now to calling for more, damaged and aged, with a tortious committee denial, six years of tortious damage measured, 2004-2010, family damage around, regrets and resentments to have not made that move, 2002.   What old resentments, resentment to rue, to have not made that move, back to the student's university city area.

                ________

                six years of tortious damage, 2004-2010, plaint on web and virtual jury call

                Free to respond as they like, what have we here, 



                __A
                __C
                __C
                __D
                __G
                __H        non-respondent to legal aid query, December 2018; lawyer; summer resident at student housing
                __H
                __H
                __J        plaintive self, sees the matter for six years, by sixty k per year, down to forty on the sixty, five by forty-five...  
                __M
                __P
                __R
                __Y


                A_J       five-point-five by forty-four for two-forty-two, five and a quarter by forty-four for two-hundred and thirty-one...  
                          five and a half by fifty-two for two-hundred and eighty-six, five and a quarter by fifty-two for two-hundred and seventy-three...  
                          five and a half by forty for two-hundred and twenty, five and a quarter by forty for two-hundred and ten...

                ________

                distribution, messages sent on topic

                my dumb, sorry story                 December 22, 2018                                 my dumb, sorry story                 December 24, 2018
                hass substitution petition, 2004, denial plaint                 February 2, 2019                 apologies, screenshots, resume attached                 February 13, 2019
                plaint on web, university committee denial, degree denied 2004-2010, student claims for $360k                 April 11, 2019                                 April 11, 2019
                six years of tortious damage, 2004-2010, plaint on web and virtual jury call                 May 4, 2019     resumé, 12/10/2018     rbrose.png (downloaded rose recolor)

                education tort plaintive query jury survey                 June 25, 2019                         February 1 check                 July 29, 2019
                pivotal errors                 August 11, 2019
                plaint page, 2004 degree denial, legal query                 August 23, 2019                                 September 16, 2019                                 September 20, 2019

                happy travels, hostile e-mail messages 2012, (not important to read)                 November 11, 2019                 Re: Link to Listings                 November 17, 2019
                garage table visits/meetings                 May 17, 2020

                cover page                 resumé, 03/31/2020                 resumé, 01/19/2021                 resumé, 01/25/2021                 resumé, 02/08/2021

                2004 degree denial and 8-sem. tuition restitution; fraternity honor claim, 40/62 k (64k?)                 September 17, 2020                 ...



                ________

                tortious rest

                Sorry about the tortious mess.   I'll see about clarifying the plaintive expression later this year, 2019.

                I feel terrible about the random death of the lawyer making a difference in the student not pushing the matter further at the time.   Tragic and poor.

                I'm not expecting to be filing a lawsuit at this point...

                I guess all I had to do was proceed with contacting that dean with my dispute and grievance, the dean for undergraduate education.   Terrible point for the student to have lost his bourgeois life from not proceeding there, damaged away.

                Amazing that the student's family couldn't be interested.   With the nominal achievement for the student's parents to have supported eight semesters somewhere already, stuck in vain disregard for any more support for that place, or interest in it, supportive otherwise, transfer credit degree completion semester somewhere else, supported years, half of seven years, eventually the extra class from the transfer credit degree completion semester, 2004-2010; instead of wrapping up the degree in 2002, affording a move to the Cambridge, Massachusetts area, requesting a dorm assignment, various decent solutions available to move to that area.


                I'm feeling poor about misusing the words "tortious" and "tort," legally perhaps, used abundantly in this piece of legal query and plaintive expression, claiming for restitution for damage from an arbitrary committee denial of student graduation, for local labour vanity defrauded, accusably.

                The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 1992, defines "tort," as "Damage, injury, or a wrongful act done willfully, negligently, or in circumstances involving strict liability, but not involving breach of contract, for which a civil suit can be brought," which would seem to be logically correct as used in this legal query and plaint page, with some indulgence in linguistic amusement to apologise for.   I might surmise it to perhaps be legally inappropriate for this matter by technical distinctions, "strict liability," what that would be; or otherwise.   I might get around to reading the Wikipedia page on torts.

                "Damage from the committee denial," "the committee denial damage," "the arbitrary committee denial," "accusable," "accusably," sorry to have been damaged by that arbitrary committee denial, invalidating their academy to this student, for their part.

                To be repaired.


                I'm Allen Jordan.   I was damaged by MIT university institute administrative vanity - an empty administrative denial of my hass-d class transferred credit institute requirement credit substitution petition, denied under a literal policy for committee on curricula to sustain/carry will/wish for denial from hass school, policy not stated or referenced in committee denial letter to student, smoothly stated as mere agreement with transfer credit examiner professor's denial; and the vanity of the ombudsperson, snotty lines, "file a grievance," upset about money; no literate reply responding to the student's letter of dispute, from denying committee head officer or ombudsperson.

                Through the performance of two office twits, the head of the committee on curricula issuing a denial statement not stating that the denial was under a policy, stated rather as mere agreement, and no literate, logical reply to student's letter of dispute, beyond the ombudsperson's message to schedule a call, to be a snotty twit on the phone.   A purely administrative committee and denial, denial policy unstated, academic fraud against the student.   To resolve the dispute, to file a grievance...


                I mentioned with my father in 2005, student age 30, father age 61 at the time, visiting while they travelled, Seattle and Vancouver from San Diego, that I could potentially overturn the denial of my hass substitution petition for my 2004-2005 degree application/denial, proceeding with contacting a dean to file a grievance, but I was figuring it likely wouldn't make a difference.   He quickly agreed with that expectation as I recall, and they came around to supporting a move for the extra class, fall 2009.   In 2019, I came around to figuring that a Dean for Undergraduate Education likely would have reversed the denial, I suppose, that my petition had not been meaningfully considered.   I am left sorry to have not queried further after the matter 2005-2009 and 2010, or heard from them on the matter.

                I appreciate having had the opportunity to take and pass interesting classes, with present, living professors to remember, at three or four fine universities.   (University of California, San Diego; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; University of Utah; one class as a listener at Boston University)


                I wasn't looking to ask for special consideration of my life circumstances, not affording a move back to Cambridge, Massachusetts area, supported for University of Utah two-class semester instead.   I ran into not having my actual transfer case considered; bulwark energy for their thing they agreed there, brass and polish, money and power, their house, their clocks, their hours, proud office twits, cool academicals, professors in hire, on fire, keeping it cool...   Professionally present in their thing, they agreed for their denial.   The student's letter of dispute awaiting academical response (academic review/response), grievous loss.   Denial, dispute, grievance and loss, grievance to file, damaged.

                Apology for some excessive writing, language and material, in this 2004-2005 undergraduate degree denial / transfer credit completion solution denial complaint / grievance statement page, written December 2018 through April 11, 2021 presently (small changes to end of previous paragraph, 05/26/21).   Thinking about trimming the composition, I would also keep a copy of the longer expression viewable, possibly with further notes and editing.   2004 student degree completion experience page linked.  



                ________

                student grievance, undergraduate, 2004, hass substitution petition denial                         page color, black on white,   black on gray,   white on blue;     about page / home


                application for bachelor of science degee, 2004                 February 1                 SB degree application, form to fill, mailed letter, June 11                 July 12
                class credit transfer forms 2004                 transfer-credit-form-hist1020_.jpg                 transfer-credit-form-math3070_.jpg                     2004 degree completion page
                hass substitution petition form                 hass_substitution_petition_form__.jpg
                institute requirements committee                 committee_denial_.txt                     student dispute letter re institute requirements denial                     ombudsperson contact call memory
                humanities departments school office letter to student that it opposes hass substitution petitions and that it is the "committee's policy to follow the recommendation" of the school "on this kind of issue"

                readmission form, for spring 2010                 p2         p3         p4         p5         attachment 1, page 1         attachment 1, page 2         attachment 2                 physics major status sheet